by Ben Vernia | February 6th, 2024
On February 5, the Department of Justice announced that it had filed a complaint intervening in a whistleblower’s lawsuit alleging that a former owner and executive of an Illinois-based provider of mobile cardiac PET scan services. According to DOJ’s press release:
The United States has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas under the False Claims Act (FCA) against Rick Nassenstein, a resident of Florida and formerly the president, chief financial officer, and co-owner of Illinois-based Cardiac Imaging Inc. (CII), a provider of mobile cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) scans.
The complaint alleges Nassenstein knowingly played a central role in a scheme whereby CII paid exorbitant, above-fair market value fees to doctors who referred patients to CII for cardiac PET scans in violation of the Physician Self-Referral Law, also known as the Stark Law. It prohibits health care providers from billing Medicare for certain designated health services referred by a physician with whom the provider has a financial relationship, including a compensation arrangement, that does not meet any statutory or regulatory exception. Congress enacted the Stark Law to protect Medicare patients from financial arrangements that can adversely impact physicians’ decision making and lead to unnecessary services. Claims knowingly submitted to Medicare in violation of the Stark Law also violate the federal FCA.
* * *
Cardiac PET scans are nuclear medicine tests that doctors use to help assess heart function and diagnose cardiac disease. The United States’ complaint alleges CII provided cardiac PET scans on a mobile basis and paid the referring physicians, usually cardiologists, to provide the physician supervision required under Medicare rules. The United States alleges that from at least 2017 through June 2023, Nassenstein caused CII to enter into compensation arrangements with referring cardiologists, under which the cardiologists were paid as if they were fully occupied supervising CII’s scans, even though the cardiologists were actually providing care to other patients in their offices or were not even on site. The complaint alleges CII’s fees also purportedly compensated the cardiologists for additional services beyond supervision that were not actually provided.
The lawsuit was originally filed under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the FCA by Lynda Pinto, a former billing manager at CII. Under the FCA, private parties, known as relators, can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of the recovery. The FCA permits the United States to intervene in and take over the action, as it has done here. If a defendant is found liable for violating the FCA, the United States may recover three times the amount of its losses plus applicable penalties.
* * *
